|
1.
|
participation
|
|
2.
|
It means a renewal of the web industry, a mature streamlining of previously hodge-podge technologies under a single slick monicker, associated with stuff like AJAX.
|
|
3.
|
elementally: seperating content from structure.
oh, and using helvetica rounded for display types and logos...
|
|
4.
|
interactive web applications, malliable to uers' whims and designed in sweet pastels or earth tones, rounded corners, sweet fades.
|
|
5.
|
Cross-platform web applications, usually with an AJAX display interface. Underlying processing can be handled many ways, but response time for the user is quick (much quicker than the Java interfaces from a few years ago).
|
|
6.
|
A bit overhyped at this point, but to me it means an evolution of the web as a resource for accessing online applications and collaboration tools.
|
|
7.
|
not sure
|
|
8.
|
a set of evolution of ther web around scalability, cost effectiveness, remixable data, open source mentality
architectur of participation
|
|
9.
|
Open source, API, convenience, and innovation.
|
|
10.
|
The pendulum has swung back to the little guy for now. Now the big guys like Murduch have to buy the little guys like MySpace. Curious to see how the big guys will actually regain the upper hand technically beyond aquisitions. What moves does Microsoft have left to try to kill web 2.0? Is the public finally too smart to fall for trojan programs from Microsoft whose ultimate goal is the payment of high license fees down the road.
|
|
11.
|
I'm assuming this is Internet 2?
|
|
12.
|
AJAX, rounded corners, user-customizable CSS interface...the layman's knowledge of it all.
|
|
13.
|
Don't know - I've just heard it.
|
|
14.
|
a more interactive, functional approach of web for both personal/commercial application
|
|
15.
|
it's a broad term...to me, it is an evolved form of web use - strategic business and economic application of the technology
|
|
16.
|
Buzzword for productivity or networking web apps, often ones that use AJAX, Ruby on Rails etc. Doesn't really mean much, not that bothered about it...
|
|
17.
|
Mostly hype.
|
|
18.
|
It's not so much about the techniques, as I see it. The techiques (XmlHTTPRequests etc) have been here for years, but Web 2.0 hasn't. So for me Web 2.0 is more about how the web apps gets an experience closer to desktop applications and how it lets people collaborate and share information.
|
|
19.
|
hype mostly - social networking/sharing via the web
|
|
20.
|
Organic approach to creating web applications. End users dictate functionality--bottom up approach.
|
|
21.
|
It's just a buzzword to help the web gain momentum. To me (a web developer) it means, well, nothing. I remember back in the day when they would describe web sites in terms of "generations". Now, I think they they are giving these generations version numbers (e.g. Web 2.0)
|
|
22.
|
The ability to do online what used to be only desktop - collaboration, word processing, etc.
|
|
23.
|
next generation of services for the Web - better, integrated web applications; use of technologies such as Ajax; web standards and so on...
|
|
24.
|
Application-centered, highly responsive websites developed after 2002 that have replicated the functions of traditional desktop applications.
|
|
25.
|
It means compatability and searchability. It also means ugly.
Any strict Web 2.0 interface I've seen looks sterile and uninviting - user-friendly, but definitely not inviting.
|
|
26.
|
nothing
|
|
27.
|
A fuzzy idea...maybe a bubble with lots of good ideas behind. (not only AJAX or Folksonomies...is a new strategy)
|
|
28.
|
AJAX, Flash, slow wait times for interactivity, plastic buttons, instant gratification
|
|
29.
|
new web apps. some aren't very useful and the term is slowly losing it's appeal as javascript is STILL a misfit when it comes to security, primarily in the league of cross-site integration and user-contributed material.
|
|
30.
|
Zip. It doesn't mean a thing - and I work in an interactive development firm working on projects for companies like DreamWorks, Symbol Technologies, and AMD. While there's a solid foundation to it's meaning; but it's more of an evolution than a quick implementation/fix.
|
|
31.
|
simple minded label created to try and explain the difference between overhyped companies in the late 90's versus overhyped companies in the 00's
|
|
32.
|
1. To use applications remotely via a web browser like you (used) to use applications locally on your PC.
2. To do stuff on the web rather than have the web tell you or sell you stuff.
|
|
33.
|
Web applications that keep away from the cluttered developer-created application interfaces to more ergonomic and information-centered displays that minimize presentation to the useful features.
|
|
34.
|
To me it refers to websites which embrace new collaborative or socially orientated ways of engaging the user and providing added useful content using new technologies
|
|
35.
|
Next generation of the Web
|
|
36.
|
I think of it as the move toward user generated content and extreme flexibility and quick iteratation, as demonstrated by things like wikis, myspace, mash ups, blogosphere, google maps, etc. But I'm aware that others see it as more programming-based, referencing "Ajax" and such.
|
|
37.
|
read/write web - the next level of interactivity
|
|
38.
|
A new way of doing things... opensource, sharing, colaboration... etc.
|
|
39.
|
Kind of a puffed-up way to say you're using 'new' technologies such as ajax. More of a marketing term in my opinion. Then again, I could have missed something ...
|
|
40.
|
overly buzzy, of course, but a great means of collectively referring to a bunch of very useful technologies and companies.
|
|
41.
|
The second coming of "good" web technologies (apps).
|
|
42.
|
Dynamic, standards compliant websites that either have a social angle or provide some level of customisation through modules or an API.
|
|
43.
|
Semantic Web, integrated products and services sharing data - information based companies and services, the end of the monolith.
|
|
44.
|
All the new AJAX stuff appearing on the web - it means online applications like Gmail Basecamp etc. and is the way forward for the net and the people who rely on it for their living.
|
|
45.
|
Flickr, Basecamp etc
|
|
46.
|
It means several different things ... or that's how I've seen it used.
I like best the ideas that Tim O'Reilly discusses in his 2005 posting on "Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software." Ideas like the web as platform, harnessing collective intelligence/data as paramount (use of the tool/data adds structure and content which then builds on itself), end of the software release cycle (as seen by the end user ... rolling releases/constant small changes).
Here's a link to his post (http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html). It's the first hit in Google for web 2.0. ... And no, I didn't hit Google before writing this. I had read this months ago.
|
|
47.
|
technologies allowing web designers to create better web sites with more functionality (tools) for the end user
- example of a Web 2.0 characteristic - immediate changes without having to refresh the whole page
|
|
48.
|
Its meant to mean the new generation web but seems to apply to anything involving interaction, blogs, wikis ajax - dynamic applications. Its an idea rather than a standard at the moment
|
|
49.
|
No software... just a browser, wherever, whenever!
|
|
50.
|
That we are moving into a new, more intensive phase of web innovation, saturation, and use.
|
|
51.
|
The new generation of sharing and connecting people and sites on the web.
|
|
52.
|
it's a lot of blah blah blah.
|
|
53.
|
Web 2.0 is the move from static web pages to collaborative and shared web applications and user experiences like BaseCamp, Blogs, Wikis etc.
|
|
54.
|
Next Generation web,for example improved usability (using Ajax etc) & intelligent web services. It's the future :)
|
|
55.
|
Faster applications
Making Web almost like a Desktop
|
|
56.
|
branding, slogan idea. (pessimistic side) optimistic side- social networking and the tools that integrate it. tools built on web standards.
|
|
57.
|
Heard of it but means nothing!
|
|
58.
|
It used to mean "Highly interactive web sites". Now it means "Best buzzword since Enterprise Solution"
|
|
59.
|
I have studied this in some depth, but to me it first of all signifies a move from desktop applications for basic productivity to the web.
Second, to me web2.0 applications feature Ajax technology as design element. This is not just emulating desktop applications but is a merge of web design with interactivity.
One characteristic of this is "edit in place" which is best demonstrated in Backpack. The UI is not cluttered with links, buttons and controls but it appears as a simple published page. But when you hover over an element you can click to open it for editing or add more. This in-context, inplace editing of a page is the defining feature of Web2.0 applications.
I think maybe I should put this in my blog!
whtbrd.squarespace.com
|
|
60.
|
People who know how to use Photoshop ;-). For me its interconnectivity between online services. (RSS, Tagging, etc.)
|
|
61.
|
simplifying the web (and life), by solving common problems in the simplest fashion possible.
|
|
62.
|
The new Web, with a focus on services, productivity, and sharing information rather than a narrow focus of sales alone.
|
|
63.
|
The new web..
|
|
64.
|
to me it means usable, high quality, practical software and services delivered via http. To most it seems to merely mean stick some AJAX in your interface.
|
|
65.
|
The interactive or social network web, where information flows both ways. I see Basecamp as being something that is web 2 in its approach.
|
|
66.
|
The next step for the web ? Web based applications that look more like desktop apps - more hype than substance ?
|
|
67.
|
Snazzy looking web-apps, they way they were always supposed to be
|
|
68.
|
Collaboration, folksonomy, mashups
|
|
69.
|
Rounded corners, Ajaxy fade effects,
|
|
70.
|
Content being initially loaded on the first page hit, then all activity just updating information on my local PC until the data needs to be sent back, giving a more "Desktop" feel to the web.
|
|
71.
|
Web-based tools that allow for easier sharing and collaboration.
|
|
72.
|
Can't remember--just sounds familiar.
|
|
73.
|
I have heard that term from web developers but I d/k what it means. A new version of the web? D/k.
|
|
74.
|
Extendible Web Applications
|
|
75.
|
It means your about to try and sell me something wrapped in a package that's meant to bring back the spirit and excitement of the dot com boom era. To me it's the used car salesman quote of the modern web era! Don't use it please!
|
|
76.
|
For me it means the web providing applications and becoming truly interactive and usable - without loading software on my PC
|
|
77.
|
the delivery of a service, which, at the point of contact with the user demonstrably shifts the power to the user
|
|
78.
|
New wave of web applications and services - they have certain look as well as certain features, mindset and technologies - big fonts,gradients,tabs,tags,AJAX etc - somone did a good Ta-da list on their attributes - see also TechCrunch
|
|
79.
|
Not sure really - but maybe web based applications?
|
|
80.
|
Richer websites. Better interactivity. Apps that don't need upgrading (by the user). At last, a move of functionality and information management from the desktop to the network.
|
|
81.
|
Better interfaces
|
|
82.
|
applications that used to run on your computer are now hosted by some provider, you only need your browser to use them. the future of software for small companies.
|
|
83.
|
It means what Basecamp is -- an app that is all web-based.
|
|
84.
|
A buzzword to create a bit of hype, but ultimately a good thing because it will further define the internet and enable the internet to be a better, more usable, accessable and perhaps standards based experience.
|
|
85.
|
lol.. nice one.
Web 2.0 is a fancy term for good user interfaces on the web. web 2.0 = usability for users and developers.
|
|
86.
|
It means that the broader world of media and interested observers need a catch-all term to use as a handle for all this "new" stuff.... :)
|
|
87.
|
It's a buzzword that has no meaning to the latest style of applications that have appeared on the web.
To tag an application with this is ridiculous. How far will it be before we dismiss this stupid term? Web 10.5 in 10 years?
|
|
88.
|
A world free of its dependence on all things Microsoft! ;-)
|
|
89.
|
easy sharing of data betwen web applicationsI think?
|
|
90.
|
Branding to represent transactional versus one way web services eg wikis, blogs, etc.
|
|
91.
|
Making desktop applications work on the web, so they can be used collaboratively and independent from geo location.
|
|
92.
|
on one hand: more "semantic" web, can use data from one site on another site (or other thing). on the other hand: yet another buzzword
|
|
93.
|
User interaction with 2nd generation web based facilities for collaboration and share...delivered via server side software and technologies!!
|
|
94.
|
Useful web applications, that actually can solve things
Easy communication
|
|
95.
|
blogs, boards, pesonal opinions and sharing of information on a "personal" level
|
|
96.
|
Ajax technologies and web services
|
|
97.
|
For me, web 2.0 is the name for the change in how we perceive the internet; the change from static, one-sided information flow (server -* browser) to dynamic, interactive, reactive applications that through the power of Ajax, Ruby and whatnot combine the usability and customization of desktop apps with the power of the internet that is networking, instant availability of information and the possibility to keep an application up to date without any action required by the user.
|
|
98.
|
Totally over hyped interest/focus regarding Ruby/Ajax powered apps and what a handful of people have built with them
case of the Emperors new clothes *yawn
|
|
99.
|
User-centric distributed value creation. Alignment of business and technology.
|
|
100.
|
A new way of dealing with user experience. It entails making the web application more like a desktop application as well as a more community oriented approach.
|
|
101.
|
Technologically it means a new combination of existing web technologies that enable us to develop new types of web applications.
Sociologically it means the stronger involvement of the user within the production of content and the development of a new public with the means of new communication platforms.
|
|
102.
|
Hype. Marketing buzzword. For the next generation of web development.
|
|
103.
|
easy social applications
|
|
104.
|
user generated content. real time site upadating. Modular sites.
|
|
105.
|
New set of focussed and collaborative webapps that have a destinct objective without being "enterprise software" but solving simple and everyday tasks in a meaningful and simple way.
|
|
106.
|
direct felt interactivity in web pages by client driven functionality coupled with asynchronous traffic to serverside
|
|
107.
|
marketing bullshit about using smartly some old technology (css+js+dom)
|
|
108.
|
AJAXifying and spicing up Web Applications with features that we already know from our Desktops. If Basecamp is defined as a Web 2.0 App then I'm definitely a proponent of Web 2.0 but I'm afraid that we'll mainly end up bloating the WWW with crappy and useless Outlook clones and solitaires.
|
|
109.
|
Next generation web standard.
|
|
110.
|
new generation of web-based software
|
|
111.
|
convenience - writing code that can reflect changes on-the-fly without having to reload the page, allowing users to contribute like wikipedia, basically using the web as a platform that anyone can use rather than using it to allow certain people to serve content to other people who can't contribute back. Making the web two-way.
|
|
112.
|
An Ajax(ish) based web service
|
|
113.
|
A new generation of web applications, with cool stuff like ajax & tags.
|
|
114.
|
Buzzzzzzz
|
|
115.
|
An internet that is more dynamic and rich in experience. The Internet turns into more of a dynamic application where all our different interests and data integrate.
|
|
116.
|
Websites that work a little more like desktop apps, and/or a little more like real life.
|
|
117.
|
all kind of web related software. No local software but 'web based'.
|
|
118.
|
Collective intelligence
|
|
119.
|
AJAX? Really cool interactive web applications?
|
|
120.
|
Survivors of the dot com boom. As well as old world ISP's and telco's that want to charge for access to so called "premium site content".
|
|
121.
|
It means rounded corners, gradients, DHH, 37s, beta, and no clear revenue plan.
|
|
122.
|
over used marketing term. I mean there is so much left to be discovered in web 1.5.
|
|
123.
|
I know that this is not the standard definition, but to me: particularly those sites that are built to be web-resident in terms of data and functionality, and that do so with great, clean code and AJAX or modern, elegant interfaces. Also that enable strong, web-based collaboration. 2.0 for me: textdrive, strongspace, joyent, basecamp.
|
|
124.
|
Interactive two way communication and applications mashed together to make better apps.
|
|
125.
|
The salesmans are speaking =)
Ajax is very powerful but Web 2.0 is bullshit. Lets talk about Internet and stop confusing normal users.
|
|
126.
|
Applications originally intended for the desktop being available via the web.
|
|
127.
|
not sure. I saw it in Seth Godin's blog.
|
|
128.
|
User-generated content over the web. We create our own "spaces" over the web, they're not downloaded onto us.
|
|
129.
|
No idea.
|
|
130.
|
AJAX, Interactive Applications
|
|
131.
|
the wisdom of the crowds
|
|
132.
|
The new improved (and more useful) internet.
|
|
133.
|
A new set of tools, styles, and attitudes toward the web. Dynamic controls, portable data, and lots of gradients.
|
|
134.
|
interactive, quick-responding, clean websites usually geared to social purposes
|
|
135.
|
When I hear Web 2.0 I think, "Oh, it must have a funny domain name, use XMLHttpRequest all over the place, and have cute JavaScript special effects."
|
|
136.
|
I think of it as a higher functioning more interactive Web application style that provides better feed back and support for the task at hand than previous Web apps were able to do without binary and java app downloads.
|
|
137.
|
the "new" web; more niche-oriented enabling small specialty-focused web sites to attract visitors interested in specific smaller niched topics/products versus the large I-offer-all-things behemoth sites
|
|
138.
|
Suites of web-based applications and services that actually provide value to users and are based on credible business models.
|
|
139.
|
HOTNESS!
Look I have been a long time Flash freak because you could do things like that where plain HTML could not. But Flash is really not the best solution either... Web 2.0 is, we'll keep using Flash for the other stuff Flash is good at.
Filling out forms this way(let's say adding a new category from the drop down menu) is just too slick.
No more redirecting to another damn page or popup just for a stupid task.
Keep it coming!
|
|
140.
|
It means that there are a whole slew of sites being made that all look the same.
|
|
141.
|
Mainly AJAX.
|
|
142.
|
It is the software as a service revolution that hopefully will dethrone Microsoft and other lumbering software giants who have bloated code, miserable support, and ill-defined ideas of what their customers need to be effective.
cheers,
Mike
|
|
143.
|
A new way of thinking about the web (meaning: it's not Ajax, but ajax is an enabler)
|
|
144.
|
describes the on-going transition in software development from the web sites to web serving hosted applications. Overtime, Web-based applications may completely replace desktop software.
|
|
145.
|
Web 2.0 is largley a conceit. It has to do with making web apps feel more like "regular" applications. New and better controls, perhaps AJAX enabled. There is a user-experience emphasis and community creation, folksonomies and whatnot.
|
|
146.
|
An attempt to encapsulate (and, I'd argue, postpone evolution beyond) the user empowerment movement facilitated by the interactivity of the web medium.
|
|
147.
|
Buzzword encapsulating the rise of AJAX applications, higher standards support, more small web based applications (many of which are/were influenced/inspired by you guys), and what some people consider another bubble.
|
|
148.
|
Stupid. :)
Most people seem to use the term to lump together more 'interactive' sites that use ajax to talk between servers.
|
|
149.
|
Cool...like Google
|
|
150.
|
Yes, I've heard about it, and know what it is, but it has little meaning. Its a "buzz word" for marketing folks that has little substance. Kind of like "zesty" when talking about pasta sauce. We all know that as technology matures, its gets better (hopefully) and the focus of internet technology today is interactivity.
|
|
151.
|
Fully-functioning online applications that can reasonably replace desktop apps. They're not just interactive -- they provide data persistence.
|
|
152.
|
It's a meaningless term meant to define the undefineable. However, it usually pertains to:
1) the pure technical exercise of using AJAX
2) Having glossy buttons and lots of whitespace
In reality, for the companies that truly understand what Web 2.0 is about, it means creating systems that use the above (or indeed any web technology) to create products and services that solve the traditional usability problems of online applications.
|
|
153.
|
less clicking through layers, more work done within the page. flexible tools that can be purposed easily for various diverse needs. easy to get started.
|
|
154.
|
I think it has something to do with a faster connection or interface. Not sure exactly but speed is in there somewhere.
|
|
155.
|
Working on the Webtop as opposed to the Desktop.
|
|
156.
|
A combination of technologies that give the Web user a more desktop application "feel" when using a Web site.
|
|
157.
|
no frikin clue, but it must be better than web 1.x????
|
|
158.
|
Better built web-services that are designed for users to work and complete business on the 'net.
|
|
159.
|
user generated content, social networking, all things interactive with the web instead of just newspapers/magazines/tv/traditional media on the web. Taking advantage of the full capabilities of the web.
|
|
160.
|
More sophisticated use of the web i.e. del.icio.us, AJAX, community-based stuff, collaboration.
|
|
161.
|
That's just another muthafuckin' buzz word-n-shit yo!!
|
|
162.
|
AOL is dead
|
|
163.
|
Form me XHML & AJAX, and this site.
|
|
164.
|
An overhyped term that means some component of AJAX or social software, or web companies built to flip, depending on who you talk to.
|
|
165.
|
Making the web suck less. (Also, making javascript useful by putting business logic back on the server). Do I need to mention Ajax?
|
|
166.
|
A newer more user friendly, realistic internet that offers an environment to develop better and more useful tools. Less hype more ingenuity and user friendly tools that actually expand ebusiness and eRecreation. Post internet bubble crash. The real deal.
|
|
167.
|
new level of using web like platform for apllication and services, not only data mining
|
|
168.
|
AJAX, Cool CSS, Nifty interfaces, where all websites are going
|
|
169.
|
A way of using web technologies to get greater value out of our (relatively) new capacity to be connected to each other.
|
|
170.
|
buzz. websites with certain features that websites didn't used to have. increased interactivity, ...
|
|
171.
|
hype.. just like CRM. I suppose it means making the web more like a RIA with Ajax and the like. I don't really care, just build me a better basecamp..
|
|
172.
|
Not alot it is just a buzz word from what I have read.
|
|
173.
|
BASECAMP :D!!!! THANKS FOR YOUR PRODUCT!!! BASECAMP IS WEB 2.0 :D!!!
|
|
174.
|
Web-based applications founded on the thin/light-client model made possible by clever XHTML/CSS/JavaScript
|
|
175.
|
Incorporating new technologies into the web such as AJAX, ORM, and moving web-applications towards behaving more like desktop applications by providing user-interaction...
|
|
176.
|
"the new web".. more interactivity without the slow (obvious) client/server relationship
|
|
177.
|
it refers to the newer, sleeker look and feel that many site's now employ.
|
|
178.
|
next best thing for web :)
|
|
179.
|
Ergonomic communications and information exchange on the web.
|
|
180.
|
bad synonym for read/write web. alternatively, something you say to people so they will give you money ;)
|
|
181.
|
web applications with responsive interfaces
|
|
182.
|
its a buzzword
|
|
183.
|
right now, absolutley nothing. it just sounds like marketing buzz.
|
|
184.
|
its a buzz word... describes new ways to develop web apps.
|
|
185.
|
Glossy button goodness
|
|
186.
|
It's an umbrella term for a web site that features any two of the following: ajax, rails, or profitability.
|
|
187.
|
more like a desktop application without entire page needing to refresh. hover interactions. much more user intereaction.
|
|
188.
|
A very stupid marketing term that has some vague connection to AJAX applications, but that isn't always true. Some people reference the fact the smaller firms are controlling theses new types of apps not large companies as part of "Web 2.0". If I were you I wouldn't use the term.
|
|
189.
|
Applications that run as if they are on your desktop. Drag and drop, etc. Web 2.0 is really just a buzzword, but to me if something is touted as web 2.0 it means the app offers new functionality and possibly more desktop-like functionality. I also think of AJAX apps when I hear web 2.0.
|
|
190.
|
Yes, but I'm not sure what it means. I guess the next generation of web -- perhaps indicating revolutionary or at least major change?
|
|
191.
|
2nd genereation of web applications and solutions - very much like basecamp - post 1999 web events...
|
|
192.
|
Another way to sell more crap.
|
|
193.
|
It means spending as little money as possible, running your company as lean as possible, and focusing the maority of your marketing efforts on the web to get the job done better than the comeptition.
|
|
194.
|
The next stage... but that's all!!!
|
|
195.
|
From a user's point of view it means user driven content or community influenced - and the user experience is a key enabler to this making it work - tools like AJAX help make this happen, but AJAX by itself is not web2.0. From a developers point of view it means a different approach to developing services (from long requirement and build cycles, to faster iterations)
|
|
196.
|
Hype
|
|
197.
|
Websites that act more like desktop applications, but also integrate sharing features that turn computing into a collaborative tool. Tagging, etc.
|
|
198.
|
Not much, I know I've heard it but I don't really understand it.
|
|
199.
|
Efficient user interfaces. Minimal clicks to get things done.
|
|
200.
|
Marketing
|
|
201.
|
Next Gen WWW infrastructure
|
|
202.
|
New definition of usability standards. Moving more local applications to web applications. Increased sharing of data and responsibilities due to increased access to information that allows workers to work anywhere.
|
|
203.
|
web applications - and it seems that most web 2.0 apps make use of RoR and/or AJAX.
|
|
204.
|
Just another buzz-word. Yawn.
|
|
205.
|
Highly interactive, personalized social web interfaces
|
|
206.
|
Pretty sites. No just kidding, community for one, as a developer RoR, there are so many others but community and software intelligence are the keys.
|
|
207.
|
I think I saw it in one of your web pages - Does it mean the second coming of web entrepreneurs?
|
|
208.
|
heard of it doesn't mean anything to me.
|
|
209.
|
Pages can be dynamically updated based on user feedback, without reloading the whole page. VERY user-friendly.
|
|
210.
|
over-hyped
|
|
211.
|
asdf
|
|
212.
|
overplayed
|
|
213.
|
No sure
|
|
214.
|
It represents the tangible and useful aspects and technologies of the WWW left behind in the crucible after the dot-com immolation.
|
|
215.
|
RUBY BABY!
|
|
216.
|
a new generation of web interaction.
|
|
217.
|
sometimes hype / sometimes innovation
|
|
218.
|
AJAX + SOA.
|
|
219.
|
Hmmmm. The world is talking about Web Services and morphing SOA into WOA - Web Oriented Architecture. I think the popular answer to what is Web 2.0 is along the lines of Web Services. I am currently working with a startup, FifthWeb, (the people who told me about BaseCamp), and they are building some technology which will turn this on its head. Think Napster, Bit Torrent being enable for the commercial world. Supply/Value Chains in a peer to peer operation with no central hub/portal/website. that is where I believe the web is heading.
Why do you ask?
|
|
220.
|
A user centric web methodology simplifying complex processes through easy to use interfaces, making once complex applications easy to use.
|
|
221.
|
life inside the static
|
|
222.
|
Goddamn stupid-ass marketing term that I'd prefer to never hear again. Tends to refer to AJAX-related technologies, ways to refresh page content without new page loads. Cool but over-used in some sites (Basecamp exempt).
|
|
223.
|
Next gen web. Application using ajax, etc... to make the web more productive
|
|
224.
|
marketing buzz-phrase!
|
|
225.
|
The web + collaboration.
|
|
226.
|
Three things: 1) AJAX et. al (more interactive interfaces, 2) Service Oriented Architectures - Web Services etc. for new types of applications and 3) social networking sites (linked-in et. al.). Term is seriously overused.
|
|
227.
|
I believe it was in the context of a bigger, better, faster version of Web 1.0, as in an upgrade.
|
|
228.
|
Clean interface, no major page refreshes when using controls (eg, Google maps)
|
|
229.
|
O'Reilly's definition.
|
|
230.
|
high value applications instead of just services.
|
|
231.
|
Hmmm...I hear something like that all the time in relation to anything that is next generation. Not sure if I have a specific definition of Web 2.0, though.
|
|
232.
|
Marketing term. Hype.
|
|
233.
|
"Just call it the Internet. That way, everyone will know what you mean."
This article sums it up perfectly for me: http://www.slate.com/id/2138951/
|
|
234.
|
stuff that auto updates on the fly - some crazy stuff called ajax or something like that
|
|
235.
|
Catch phrase residue from the .com time - I am working on Web 3.0.. email me if you have any other suggestion boxes: asturm@adamsonadvertising.com
Thanks a billion - you guys rock!
|
|
236.
|
a new development tendency
|
|
237.
|
it means whatever you want it to mean. my fucking dog is web2.0, so are all those ajaxed, RoRed apps with bubble fonts and too many gradients.
|
|
238.
|
A somewhat played out way to say a lot of things - I know different people mean different things when they say it - some mean AJAX or RoR. Others use Web 2.0 to reffer to a new breed of servicey web-apps that make $$$, rather than old-school e-com, etc. That's what I mean when I say it :)
|
|
239.
|
Yes, we use it with our clients. For us it means websites focused on community / integration with other sites and services along with a touch of AJAX goodness.
|
|
240.
|
Means we all got better at JavaScript
|
|
241.
|
Web + Community (personalization)
|
|
242.
|
lucida grande and web apps by cool companies.
not a really second generation movement really, more a snapshot of a ongoing progression.
|
|
243.
|
not sure
|
|
244.
|
It's a buzzword, in vogue. It rarely means the same thing to two different people/companies. Mostly it seems to mean "37Signals-like"
|
|
245.
|
Next generation social web
|
|
246.
|
New-fangled technology ;-)
|
|
247.
|
it means that people name things ____sonomy
|
|
248.
|
It means 37 signals kicks my ass all over town!!!
|
|
249.
|
it means some corporate is throwing around buzz words trying to impress me. Web 2.0 doesn't exist it more of a gradual improvement that a Versioned internet.
|
|
250.
|
ajax and tagging is what i basically understand it to be - but i really think people should realize MySpace as Web 2.0 :)
|